Coryphantha echinus

If you have a cactus plant and need help identifying it, this is the place to post it.
Post Reply
peterb
Posts: 9516
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:19 am
Location: Chandler, Arizona, USA

Coryphantha echinus

Post by peterb »

I was looking over the photos of Coryphantha echinus here on the guide and it seems there is something odd about both of Ed Utley's plants. I'm not entirely sure either photo is of echinus. The photo of the plant from Dagger Flat, for example, or from Tony's collection, etc., these are classic echinus. My photo from Brewster County we went around a few times on, with my reference to the obscure name Coryphantha scloymoides in Weniger's book (he has it under Mammillaria). Any opinions on the two photos from Ed?

peterb
Zone 9
User avatar
king_hedes
Posts: 903
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:16 am
Location: Aransas Pass,TEXAS

Post by king_hedes »

that first pic to me looks a little different with hooked central spines but i'm not very good at identifying cactus
plant zone 9a
Matt Ivy
MildBill
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:43 pm
Location: North Texas

Post by MildBill »

Ancistrocactus brevihamatus v. brevihamatus I think.
Bill
iann
Posts: 17184
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:10 pm
Location: England

Post by iann »

Don't look like C. echinus do they. Altogether not enough spines and that central seems too hooked.
--ian
peterb
Posts: 9516
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:19 am
Location: Chandler, Arizona, USA

Post by peterb »

Interesting! I hadn't even considered Ancistrocactus brevihamatus for Ed's first photo, and that's what it seems to be. Cool.

Ed's second photo, I'm still not sure. It seems like a very young plant. A puzzler.

peterb
Zone 9
daiv
Site Admin
Posts: 23625
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 10:15 pm
Location: Long Prairie, MN
Contact:

Post by daiv »

Hi guys, I moved Ed's first picture. If the other picture continues to be elusive, I will pull it off the site to avoid confusion.
All Cacti are succulents, but not all succulents are Cacti
Post Reply