Page 1 of 2
Would you consider these to be succulents?
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2021 4:58 pm
by CactusBoss
I wonder if some common houseplants like some kinds of Dracaena(particularly snake plants) and ZZ plants would be considered succulents.
Re: Would you consider these to be succulents?
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2021 6:40 pm
by bbarv
I think Dracaenas that previously were Sansevierias are.
Re: Would you consider these to be succulents?
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2021 8:30 pm
by anttisepp
ZZ grows on direct sun with cacti, it's very compact, low and has bright shiny green leaves. Winter it spends with adeniums, dry. So it's a kind of caudex maybe and xerophytic. Dracaena draco is a xerophytic and a bit succulent also but it needs more watering than succulents at early age.
Re: Would you consider these to be succulents?
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2021 9:10 pm
by Shane
It's tricky. There isn't an agreed upon definition for what a succulent is. Any plant with fleshy parts above ground could be considered a succulent. Sansevieria would be, but I don't think other Dracaenas would be. Some other succulent houseplants not commonly thought of as succulents could include African violets, Peperomia and some orchids
Re: Would you consider these to be succulents?
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2021 9:30 pm
by anttisepp
Dracaena ombet is the only true succulent in genus Dracaena (sens. strict.).
Re: Would you consider these to be succulents?
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2022 9:54 pm
by nachtkrabb
...what the heck is a ZZ plant?
Does it thrive on music by ZZ Top?
Do they have a latin name?
Thanks,
Ms. Courious (aka Nachtkrabb)
Re: Would you consider these to be succulents?
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 12:55 am
by bbarv
Zamioculcas zamiifolia.
Never had one so have no idea which music if any it prefers
Re: Would you consider these to be succulents?
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2022 5:46 pm
by nachtkrabb
Thank you.
Re: Would you consider these to be succulents?
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2023 9:23 pm
by nachtkrabb
...if that helps: The ZZ plant is listed at llifle as succulent.
https://llifle.com/Encyclopedia/SUCCULE ... zamiifolia
Habit: It is an acaulescent, perennial herb, from a stout succulent rhizome. It is normally evergreen, but becomes deciduous during drought, surviving drought due to the rhizome that stores water until rainfall resumes.
Re: Would you consider these to be succulents?
Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2023 6:20 am
by Mrs.Green
anttisepp wrote: ↑Thu Aug 12, 2021 8:30 pm
ZZ grows on direct sun with cacti, it's very compact, low and has bright shiny green leaves. Winter it spends with adeniums, dry. So it's a kind of caudex maybe and xerophytic. Dracaena draco is a xerophytic and a bit succulent also but it needs more watering than succulents at early age.
..and still it often described as a ‘low light need’ plant.. From my own experience; that’s wrong. (The ZZ plant, just to clarify)
Re: Would you consider these to be succulents?
Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2023 6:24 am
by Mrs.Green
bbarv wrote: ↑Thu Aug 12, 2021 6:40 pm
I think Dracaenas that previously were Sansevierias are.
Isn’t that a bit disputed? That Sansevierias should now be classified as Dracenas? I will stubbornly still call them Sansevierias..
Re: Would you consider these to be succulents?
Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2023 12:20 pm
by anttisepp
Mrs.Green wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2023 6:24 am <...> Isn’t that a bit disputed? That Sansevierias should now be classified as Dracenas?
Simply don't pay attention.
Re: Would you consider these to be succulents?
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2023 5:43 am
by Mrs.Green
anttisepp wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2023 12:20 pm
Mrs.Green wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2023 6:24 am <...> Isn’t that a bit disputed? That Sansevierias should now be classified as Dracenas?
Simply don't pay attention.
Re: Would you consider these to be succulents?
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2023 10:32 am
by nachtkrabb
Mrs.Green wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2023 6:20 am
anttisepp wrote: ↑Thu Aug 12, 2021 8:30 pm
ZZ grows on direct sun with cacti, it's very compact, low and has bright shiny green leaves. Winter it spends with adeniums, dry. So it's a kind of caudex maybe and xerophytic. Dracaena draco is a xerophytic and a bit succulent also but it needs more watering than succulents at early age.
..and still it often described as a ‘low light need’ plant.. From my own experience; that’s wrong. (The ZZ plant, just to clarify)
...yeessss... The ZZ plant can survive even low light tortures.
But that just shows how strong it is and how well it can cope with loads of bad circumstances. But will it thrive beautifully? That's the other question.
N.
Re: Would you consider these to be succulents?
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2023 10:41 am
by nachtkrabb
About (the former) Sansevieria trifasciata (let's ignore the renaming for a while):
According to a study by the NASA that plant filters Benzol, Formaldehyde, Trichlorethen, Xylols & Toluol out of the air.
Don't ask me how much or how those get into our air in the first place. But interesting, isn't it?
N.
Just hope I got the english names of thos e chemicals correctly....