The CoronaCactus misc. thread 2009
- CoronaCactus
- Posts: 10421
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 6:16 pm
- Location: Corona, California USA [Zone 10]
- Contact:
The CoronaCactus misc. thread 2009
So i figured i'd go back to my all-in-one thread. Rather than starting a bunch of new threads, i'll stuff this one with all my flower pics, new additions, etc... The last thread got pretty large and i got off track, but having it all in one thread makes it easy to search for later.
I'll start this off with some new additions.
Echinocereus dasyacanthus v. rectuspinus
Form #1
Echinocereus dasyacanthus v. rectuspinus
Form #2
Echinocereus pacificus
Form #1
Form #2
Neochilenia glabrescens
(=Eriosyce napina ssp. glabrescens)
Form #1
Form #2
Epithelantha micromeris v. uguispina
Escobaria strobiliforims
(=E. tuberculosa)
Glandulicactus mathssonii
(=Scelerocactus uncinatus)
I'll start this off with some new additions.
Echinocereus dasyacanthus v. rectuspinus
Form #1
Echinocereus dasyacanthus v. rectuspinus
Form #2
Echinocereus pacificus
Form #1
Form #2
Neochilenia glabrescens
(=Eriosyce napina ssp. glabrescens)
Form #1
Form #2
Epithelantha micromeris v. uguispina
Escobaria strobiliforims
(=E. tuberculosa)
Glandulicactus mathssonii
(=Scelerocactus uncinatus)
- CoronaCactus
- Posts: 10421
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 6:16 pm
- Location: Corona, California USA [Zone 10]
- Contact:
Mammillaria hernandezii
Mammillaria saffordii
(=M. carretii)
Mammillaria schwarzii
Parodia maxima
(=P. commutans)
Turbinicarpus polanskii
Turbinicarpus schmiedickeanus v. macrochele
Cleistocactus baumannii ??
Echinocereus spinigemmatus L1246
Cylindropuntia caribaea
Opuntia chaffeyi
Copiapoa mollicula
Mammillaria saffordii
(=M. carretii)
Mammillaria schwarzii
Parodia maxima
(=P. commutans)
Turbinicarpus polanskii
Turbinicarpus schmiedickeanus v. macrochele
Cleistocactus baumannii ??
Echinocereus spinigemmatus L1246
Cylindropuntia caribaea
Opuntia chaffeyi
Copiapoa mollicula
Last edited by CoronaCactus on Mon Feb 09, 2009 11:00 pm, edited 3 times in total.
- cactuspolecat
- Posts: 3866
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 9:59 am
- Location: Devonport, Tasmania. OZ
- CoronaCactus
- Posts: 10421
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 6:16 pm
- Location: Corona, California USA [Zone 10]
- Contact:
Thanks guys
It's been awhile since i posted up new additions, so get ready, that was the first wave But i'll give you some time to rest!
Peter, I was hoping you may know more about that dasyacanthus rectuspinus. I've never heard of it either. Going strictly off the many listings in Ralph Martins field number query, it comes from pretty much the same area; North of Flores Magon, Chihuahua, Mexico. I'm pretty sure there is a collection number to go with them, but can't read the label.
It's been awhile since i posted up new additions, so get ready, that was the first wave But i'll give you some time to rest!
Peter, I was hoping you may know more about that dasyacanthus rectuspinus. I've never heard of it either. Going strictly off the many listings in Ralph Martins field number query, it comes from pretty much the same area; North of Flores Magon, Chihuahua, Mexico. I'm pretty sure there is a collection number to go with them, but can't read the label.
- CoronaCactus
- Posts: 10421
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 6:16 pm
- Location: Corona, California USA [Zone 10]
- Contact:
Does not look like Eulychnia is it. Very wrong flowers. The right ones are hard not to recognize - they are like nothing else
http://www.atacamaphoto.com/atacama-flo ... lora88.htm
http://www.atacamaphoto.com/atacama-flo ... lora88.htm
- CoronaCactus
- Posts: 10421
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 6:16 pm
- Location: Corona, California USA [Zone 10]
- Contact:
Craig,
Well, thats the label it came with and the pics i've seen, they both have spines... They did vary quite a bit in spine length, color and body shape, but none were spineless. (thats why i got 2 )
Vlad,
You're right, the flower looks very different. However, some of the E. ritteri pics i saw, the flower looks similar. (long tube like) The stem and spines look alot like Eulychnia. Maybe those pics weren't correctly ID'd...?
Well, thats the label it came with and the pics i've seen, they both have spines... They did vary quite a bit in spine length, color and body shape, but none were spineless. (thats why i got 2 )
Vlad,
You're right, the flower looks very different. However, some of the E. ritteri pics i saw, the flower looks similar. (long tube like) The stem and spines look alot like Eulychnia. Maybe those pics weren't correctly ID'd...?
- CoronaCactus
- Posts: 10421
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 6:16 pm
- Location: Corona, California USA [Zone 10]
- Contact:
Can not find the picture, so from "The Cactus Family":
..Flowers white to pinkish, to 6-7.5 cm (1.4-3 in)long ans 1.5 cm (0.6 in) in diameter; floral tubesand pericarpels with white wool and green scales..
That is - they are longer-nerrower that of E. breviflora, but have the same characteristic wooly look and basicaly white
..Flowers white to pinkish, to 6-7.5 cm (1.4-3 in)long ans 1.5 cm (0.6 in) in diameter; floral tubesand pericarpels with white wool and green scales..
That is - they are longer-nerrower that of E. breviflora, but have the same characteristic wooly look and basicaly white
Great pics and additions Darryl!
I think your Cylindropuntia chaffeyi is actually Opuntia chaffeyi - no "cylindr" needed.
Yes, that cannot be a Eulychnia based on the flower. The New Cactus Lexicon has all the species pictured and the flowers are all like the ones vlani pointed out. They have E. iquiquensis ssp. ritteri instead of stright E. ritteri, but if the flowers were that different, there is no way that they'd change E. ritteri to a subspecies of iquiquensis.
I think your Cylindropuntia chaffeyi is actually Opuntia chaffeyi - no "cylindr" needed.
Yes, that cannot be a Eulychnia based on the flower. The New Cactus Lexicon has all the species pictured and the flowers are all like the ones vlani pointed out. They have E. iquiquensis ssp. ritteri instead of stright E. ritteri, but if the flowers were that different, there is no way that they'd change E. ritteri to a subspecies of iquiquensis.
All Cacti are succulents, but not all succulents are Cacti