Page 1 of 1

New one needing ID

Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2023 8:38 pm
by fanaticactus
When I found this at my local garden center, I thought it was a Rebutia or a Sulco..., but I can't find anything that comes close to matching. For referencing the size, it is in a 2-inch pot. If anyone has an idea, I'd appreciate hearing from you. Thanks!
Cacti 001.JPG
Cacti 001.JPG (115.11 KiB) Viewed 2497 times
Cacti 002.JPG
Cacti 002.JPG (121.37 KiB) Viewed 2497 times

Re: New one needing ID

Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2023 3:21 am
by fanaticactus
I am continuing to look for possibilities, and I happened upon Frailea. Is that possible? It looks more like that genus than Rebutia, but I still found nothing matches closely, whether it's the short, closely-held spines, the color, or the offsets.

Re: New one needing ID

Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2023 11:08 am
by gillinger
I have a R. heliosa v condorensis that looks very similar, as dark as yours.

Re: New one needing ID

Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2023 5:43 pm
by fanaticactus
I shall check out that one, gillinger. Thanks!

Re: New one needing ID

Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2023 10:22 am
by DaveW
As usual flowers decide! 2" pot it may be a Frailea but could also be of the Rebutia/Aylostera group as Gillinger says. Its often difficult to identify things from pictures rather than the actual plant.

Re: New one needing ID

Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2023 5:05 pm
by anttisepp
Sulcorebutia IMHO

Re: New one needing ID

Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2023 7:25 pm
by fanaticactus
This little guy finally bloomed, but the flower never opened fully in this intense heat we're experiencing. I've attached a photo and, as you can see, the flower was a brilliant red. I am now convinced it belongs in the Rebutia/Aylostera group, but I've not found any photos of any that clump with such small heads. Everything else seems to fit the descriptions. Member gillinger suggested R. heliosa v condorensis, and I think that's a very strong possibility. The other one I am considering is R. pygmaea. Any further thoughts now that we have a flower?
003.JPG
003.JPG (91.78 KiB) Viewed 2295 times
002.JPG
002.JPG (100.36 KiB) Viewed 2295 times
006.JPG
006.JPG (56.5 KiB) Viewed 2295 times

Re: New one needing ID

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2023 9:31 am
by DaveW
Certainly not a Frailea but looks like a Sulcorebutia/Alostera type..

Re: New one needing ID

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2023 10:15 am
by anttisepp
Very typical Aylostera flower tube, A. heliosa circle is the best suggestion 👍

eg http://www.llifle.com/Encyclopedia/CACT ... brevispina

Re: New one needing ID

Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2023 5:11 am
by fanaticactus
Thanks, anttisepp. I do believe that's the one. But such a long name for a small cactus!

Re: New one needing ID

Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2023 10:09 am
by DaveW
Can't tell from the picture but Rebutia has no hairs or bristles on the flower tube but Aylostera does.

"Mosti et al. (2011)* have split the two genera based on DNA studies. Differences between Rebutia and Aylostera include that in Rebutia the flowers tend to be uniformly coloured and have no hairs or bristles on the tube, whereas in Aylostera flowers are often bicoloured or multi-toned, have contrasting stamens and/or styles, and have hairs or bristles on the flower tube."

Re: New one needing ID

Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2023 2:07 pm
by 7george
This can be even one of the countless varieties of Aylostera pygmaea...